Why Isn't Andre Dawson in the Hall of Fame?

Former Cubs and Expos Slugger Snubbed Once Again

© Michael Spagnuolo

Jan 13, 2009
How can voters once again ignore 438 career homers and eight All-Star appearances?

Congratulations to both Rickey Henderson and Jim Rice on their inductions to the Baseball Hall of Fame. Henderson, the all-time stolen base king, and Rice, a former A.L. MVP and one of the most feared sluggers throughout the 70's and 80's, are both two very worthy members. But Rice's induction in particular does raise an interesting question: why isn't Andre Dawson in the Hall of Fame as well?

Dawson's Career Accomplishments

The numbers of "The Hawk" speak for themselves: eight All-Star appearances, eight Gold Gloves, a former N.L. MVP and Rookie of the Year. His 1987 MVP selection was all the more impressive considering Dawson's Cubs finished in last place in the N.L. East that season.

Dawson's career numbers are even more awesome: 2,774 hits, 438 home runs, 314 stolen bases and 1,591 RBI. As noted on his Wikipedia page, Dawson is only one of six players in major league history to be in the 300 home run-300 stolen base club, and is only one of three players in baseball history to be in the 400 homer-300 stolen base club.

Arguments Against Dawson

One of the more prominent arguments against Dawson's admittance into the Hall is the fact that some feel his offensive numbers with the Cubs were inflated by playing in the homer-friendly Wrigley Field. If that is the case, then wouldn't it also devalue the numbers of Ernie Banks, Billy Williams and Ryne Sandberg, all Cubs and Hall-of-Famers? Some may also cite the fact that Dawson has never been on a World Series winner, at least not as a player (he has a ring as an executive for the Florida Marlins in 2003). But again, that could also be a charge against Hall-of-Famers Banks, Williams, Sandberg and Ferguson Jenkins. Would you deny any of them Hall-of-Fame status?

Dawson Is Scandal-Free

In an era where the numbers and immortality of players (Bonds, Clemens, Sosa, McGwire, etc.) are in question, a player like Dawson is even more Hall-worthy. He did it clean, drug-free; he had no scandals throughout his career to speak of. Had he not spent a good portion of his career ruining his knees on the lousy AstroTurf of Olympic Stadium in Montreal, his already impressive numbers would have been even more staggering.

Rice, who has very comparable numbers and accomplishments to Dawson, had to wait until his final year of eligibility to be inducted to the Hall. Hopefully, it will not take as accomplished a player as Dawson as long to be equally honoured.


The copyright of the article Why Isn't Andre Dawson in the Hall of Fame? in Major League Baseball is owned by Michael Spagnuolo. Permission to republish Why Isn't Andre Dawson in the Hall of Fame? in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.




Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Jun 28, 2009 9:01 PM
Guest :
Great article. I can't believe people would even say his numbers were inflated by Wrigley. If the artifical turf the Expos played on didn't tear up his knees, he would have put up better numbers. He was a legimate 30/30 threat consistenly his first 7 or 8 seasons. I have a blog for Andre in the Hall, come by for a visit.

http://hawk4thehall.blogspot.com/

Charley
1 Comment: